29 de octubre de 2015

There's room for more of us at the top

    It is said that one night that Michelle and Barack Obama went out for dinner, the owner of the restaurant they attended asked their bodyguard to let him meet the first lady. He acceded and they talked for a while; when the man left, Barack asked her who he was and why he wanted to talk to her. She told him that the owner had been her boyfriend when she was young. The president found it very funny; <<Then -he claimed- if you had married him instead of me, you would be this restaurant's owner nowadays!>>. Michelle rapidly answered: <<No honey, if I had married that man, he would be president of the USA nowadays>>.
This anecdote suddenly became famous, triggering a huge number of debates online and leading lots of headlines, accompanied with phrases such as "The other side of the G-8 Summit" or "Michelle Obama, the president-maker". Nevertheless, the most significant one to me was, "Behind every great man there is a great woman". 

    This expression is deceptive: although it seems to put women at the same level as men and empower them, what it really does is to push them into the background, one step behind the male collective. It literally means that women's place, as human beings, is behind men, not next to them as equals.
    Before being the first lady, Michelle was also deep into politics, leading the Planning and Development Department in the government of Chicago, but she had to abandon her political career so that her husband could develop himself professionally. It is hard to believe that Barack was actually her intern when they met, and he has reached a higher position than her. Michelle Obama's story is the same as many women’s: the story of women with vision, talent and vocation for the government of human societies who can't reach their goals.
    These women are victims of a stupid discrimination caused by the fact that they have virtues which are applauded in men: a man who has initiative he is a leader, but a woman who has it is bossy; if a man takes measures against something he has character, but if a woman does it she is on her period. Any woman who stands out in the world of politics is attacked (physically or verbally) because of incoherent gender roles.
    I'll talk about numbers now, due to the fact that it is the only way to make unaware people see that sexism EXISTS and make them analyze their surroundings. According to studies made by UN Women (http://www.unwomen.org/en), we can only find 13 countries out of 200 whose government is led by women, and there are only 11 who are actual presidents. We can also say that, although the number of women in parliaments has been doubled, they just constitute a 22%. Another surprising fact is that the country where there are more female members in this institution isn't in Europe but in Africa: I'm talking about Rwanda where women have obtained the 63'8% of the seats. That is a proof that us, the Europeans, are not as advanced in this subject as we think we are.
     There aren't any laws in democratic countries that ban female participation in politics, but the reality is that when we take a look at the upper managers in any discipline, they are headed by men. ELLE magazine decided to do something in that regard initiating the More Women campaign, headed by a great video (click here to watch it:  http://www.elle.es/lo-mas-elle/ocio/mas-mujeres-elle-uk). "There's room for more of us at the top" proclaims the British edition with the hashtags #MoreWomen and #ELLEFeminism.
      I think a lot about misogyny in politics, trying to find where it comes from: do they hate us because we have vaginas or because we have ideas? How is this world going to move forward to peace if we are oppressing our equals? There is one clear thing: if humanity wants to fly, it requires two hard-working wings, both genders, and the global awareness that women's values and capacities can change the world, and we will.
Marina León Jiménez,collaborator of the Aequitas25 group 
   


    




10 comentarios:

  1. Opus optimum fecisti, Marina. Sequens opus in lingua latina fortasse scripturus es

    ResponderEliminar
    Respuestas
    1. Gratias tibi ago Hipolito! Ego potere res quam id in lingua latina scribere spero

      Eliminar
  2. When I read your article just one word came to my mind: FANTASTIC!!! (Lola H).

    ResponderEliminar
    Respuestas
    1. Thank you very much Lola! I'm glad you liked it

      Eliminar
  3. Très intéressant même pour ceux qui ne connaissent pas l'anglais. Marina démontre non seulement la façon dont elle écrit mais surtout la façon dont elle pense. Malheureusement, un «plafond de verre» est aussi invisible qu´évident. Une idée pour Aequitas25: Pourriez-vous faire parvenir notre blog á la Maison Blanche et á Michelle Obama?

    ResponderEliminar
    Respuestas
    1. Caro Germano (non fratello): grazie per la tua proposta, ma non mi sembra prattica perchè questa bella coppia se ne andrà via dalla Casa Bianca fra pochi mesi. Però ci penso. Mi sarebbe piaciuto leggere le tue sempre interesante idee in greco, ma immagino che non sai… o non puoi… Forse quella lingua classica non ne ha parole per parlare sulla equità o parità.
      E, tra questo litigio linguistico così splendido, preferisco scrivere sul post di Marina nella lingua dell’Imperio…

      Eliminar
    2. Como dice Leonor hubiera sido contradictorio escribir en griego clásico cuando las frases que estudiamos el año pasado referentes a la mujer fueron de lo más misógino (luego nos nos dirán que Platón tenía algo de feminista).
      Gracias por tu comentario Germán, siempre es un gusto saber de tu opinión! Y sí, sería un puntazo escribir a la Casa Blanca para que nos confirmase la anécdota.

      Eliminar
  4. Marina, tu energía, el poder de tus palabras, tu hábil e inteligente argumentación me hacen creer que sí, que hay sitio de sobra para las mujeres en los espacios de poder... La realidad que veo, leo, percibo me recuerda la escena del sombrerero loco en "Alicia en el país de las maravillas": "¡No hay sitio, no hay sitio!" gritaba enloquecido ante una larguísima mesa vacía...
    Es desesperante ver las fotos de cumbres y reuniones políticas de alto nivel, en las que se toman decisiones de nivel mundial, con un montón de hombre encorbatados y una o dos cabezas femeninas asomando entre tanta testosterona... Y lo peor es que esas cabecitas han tenido que asumir roles machistas para llegar allí.
    Las mujeres se quedan (nos quedamos) en el camino. Por lo que Capitolina llamaba "mandato de género"; porque las zancadillas son tan grandes que se rinden (nos rendimos); porque ser mujer, inteligente y válida es toda una amenaza para este sistema patriarcal al que le va tan bien manteniendo a las mujeres en su sitio: nos han sacado de la cocina para dejarnos monísimas sentadas en los salones y salitas (depende).
    Mi generación ha (hemos) perdido la batalla. Y si mis palabras suenan amargas es porque lo son.
    Lo único que me anima, me empuja es la firme convicción de que la vuestra va a llegar a ese "top" pisando fuerte y demostrando que se puede hacer una política diferente donde las diferencias de género, al igual que otras, no son un obstáculo para llegar a las "cocinas" del poder. Fíjate: al final, siempre una cocina.
    Muchas gracias, Marina. Por tan excelente entrada y por el debate generado.

    ResponderEliminar
  5. Vous me faites sentir toute petite! Félicitations à tous!

    ResponderEliminar
  6. Wonderful example of two relevant celebrities who show a long-term problem in the modern world. Male and female social roles are still quite different in terms of power and public responsibility. Let's continue crying out against this biased status quo.

    ResponderEliminar